UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME YOUANDAIDS THE HIV/AIDS PORTAL FOR ASIA PACIFIC
  
Make YouandAIDS your Homepage
JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS
Anonymous Expert HIV/AIDS Counseling  
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
   
About HIV/AIDS
UPDATE
ASIA PACIFIC AT A GLANCE VIETNAM THAILAND MALAYSIA IRAN SRI LANKA AFGHANISTAN DPR KOREA BANGLADESH BHUTAN CHINA FIJI INDIA Indonesia MALDIVES MONGOLIA NEPAL PAKISTAN REPUBLIC OF KOREA PHILIPPINES ASIA PACIFIC AT A GLANCE Lao People’s Democratic Republic Myanmar Cambodia Vietnam
THE EPIDEMIC
THEMES
 
Home » Guest Column » MartinKhor
 
  GUEST COLUMN
 
Patents and Access to Medicines. What can be done?
Martin Khor
 
Martin Khor There was a public outcry a few years ago over how the monopoly granted by
patents caused excessively high prices for HIV/AIDS medicines. The cost of
treatment using patented drugs was US$10,000-15,000 per patient per year in developed countries, whereas some generic producers in developing countries were able to provide treatment for as low as $140. If developing countries are able to make or import these generic drugs at cheaper cost, it would significantly increase access to medicines.

 
The Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement in the World Trade Organization in 1995 made it compulsory for WTO members to include medicines in their regime for product and process patents. Yet, while mandating that WTO members have to allow patenting for medicines, the TRIPS Agreement does contain some flexibility. For example, if patented drugs cost too much, a government can take measures such as issuing a compulsory license to an agency or company to manufacture or import a cheaper generic version of that patented drug.
 
At the WTO's Ministerial Conference in 2001, the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health was
adopted. It reaffirmed and clarified the flexibilities available under the TRIPS Agreement, and proclaimed: "We agree that
the TRIPS Agreement does not and should not prevent Members from taking measures to protect public healthEe
affirm that the Agreement can and should be interpreted in a manner supportive of WTO Members' right to protect public
health and in particular, to promote access to medicines for all."
 
If the Doha Declaration is to be of benefit, developing countries now have to establish appropriate provisions in their national patent legislation, fully exercising the options that are provided in the TRIPS Agreement. They also need national policies aimed at providing access to medicines for all.
 
A manual to navigate TRIPS
 
With this in view, the Third World Network (TWN) organized several meetings involving legal experts, NGOs and policy
makers to discuss the options available to developing countries for policies and legal provisions that are oriented to meeting public health concerns. The outcome of these meetings was a Manual on Good Practices in Public-Health-Sensitive Policy Measures and Patent Laws, recently published by TWN.
 
The Manual is a 'how-to' book for developing countries, providing policy options to import, produce and export affordable
medicines through measures that are consistent with the TRIPS Agreement; model legal provisions for national patent
laws that are sensitive to public health concerns, and consistent with the TRIPS Agreement; and proposals for an appropriate institutional and administrative framework to implement the proposed patent laws and policy measures, including for compensation to the patent holder.
 
Importing drugs
 
A country can import a generic version of a patented product by issuing a compulsory license to a company or agency
to import the drug, and the government has the freedom to determine the grounds upon which such licenses are given.
The imported drug can be from a country in which the drug is not patented, or in which the drug is patented (in which
case the exporting country also has to issue a compulsory license). The applicant first must negotiate with the patent
holder to obtain a voluntary license and, if that fails, then a compulsory license can be granted. Adequate compensation
must be paid to the patent holder.
 
A generic version of the patented drug can also be imported for 'public, non-commercial use' by the government.
Under this 'government use' procedure, the prior consent of or negotiations with the patent holder is not required, but adequate compensation has to be paid. This method is suitable if the imported drug is to be used by the government.
 
There can also be 'parallel importation' of a patented product (i.e. not the generic version) from another country
where the same patented product is being sold at a lower price than in the importing country. This is allowed under Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement on exhaustion of rights, and the Doha Declaration re-affirms this. In this case, there is no need for an importer to obtain a compulsory license, nor to pay compensation to the patent holder.
 
Local manufacture
 
If a drug is patented in a country, generic versions of the drug can be locally manufactured by a local company or agency that has been granted a compulsory license. But before applying for a compulsory license, the applicant must first make a good faith effort to negotiate with the patent holder for a voluntary license. This requirement, however, does not apply if the compulsory license is issued on grounds of public non-commercial use, for national emergencies or situations of extreme urgency and to remedy anti-competitive practices. Compensation, however,must be paid to the patent holder.
 
The government can also assign to a public or private agency the right to locally manufacture a patented product
without the patent holder's permission, provided it is used for a public non-commercial purpose. Compensation has to be paid.
 
Exporting drugs to low-capacity countries
 
A local producer of generic versions of patented products under a compulsory license or government-use provision may
export a portion of its output. However Article 31(f ) of the TRIPS Agreement requires that this production shall be "predominantly for the supply of the domestic market", and thus there is a limit to the amount that can be exported. This
restriction does not apply when the compulsory license is granted to correct anti-competitive practices.
 
This restriction is a problem for developing countries with insufficient or no drug manufacturing capacities, as they
may find it difficult to import the required medicines since there is a limit on the amount that potential exporting countries
can supply to them.
 
The Doha Declaration asked the WTO to find an 'expeditious solution'. In August 2003 the WTO General Council adopted a decision on a 'temporary solution' in the form of an interim waiver to the Article 31(f ) restriction, such that countries producing generic versions of patented products under compulsory licenses would be allowed to export the products to eligible importing countries without having to limit the exported amount.
 
However, the decision also obliges importing and exporting countries using the waiver process to undertake measures and fulfill several conditions, which are difficult to comply with.
 
The importing country has to notify the WTO about the drug that it requires and confirm it has insufficient or no manufacturing capacities to produce the drug. Finally, it must take measures to prevent the re-exportation of the products. The generic manufacturer in the exporting country will need a compulsory license and the exporting country must notify the WTO of the compulsory license and its conditions. The products must be labeled or marked through special packaging and shaping of the products.
 
The waiver is an 'interim solution' and a 'permanent solution' was to be found by the middle of 2004, but it is unlikely this deadline can be met.
 
Other measures
 
The policy options have to be backed up with the appropriate provisions in the national patent laws.The Manual provides model provisions for parallel importation, compulsory licensing and government use, as well as exceptions to patent rights, accompanied by detailed explanatory notes and examples of the relevant legal provisions in various countries.
 
Finally, the Manual has a section discussing the establishment and operation of an institution (or competent authority) to process compulsory licenses. It also examines how 'adequate remuneration' or compensation to the patent holder can be fixed, and the experience of various countries is examined.
 
Martin Khor is Director of the Third World Network, which is involved in development and environment issues. The Manual on Good Practices in Public-Health-Sensitive Policy Measures and Patent Laws is available through TWN at
twnet@po.jaring.my.
 
Previous Guest Columns
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Features | Guest Column | Interview | Freeze Frame | Artscape | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Home | About Us | Feedback | Sitemap | Contact Us
YOUANDAIDS - THE HIV/AIDS PORTAL FOR ASIA PACIFIC
   
Copyright © UNDP 2007. All Rights Reserved.