UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME YOUANDAIDS THE HIV/AIDS PORTAL FOR ASIA PACIFIC
  
Make YouandAIDS your Homepage
JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS
Anonymous Expert HIV/AIDS Counseling  
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
   
About HIV/AIDS
UPDATE
ASIA PACIFIC AT A GLANCE VIETNAM THAILAND MALAYSIA IRAN SRI LANKA AFGHANISTAN DPR KOREA BANGLADESH BHUTAN CHINA FIJI INDIA Indonesia MALDIVES MONGOLIA NEPAL PAKISTAN REPUBLIC OF KOREA PHILIPPINES ASIA PACIFIC AT A GLANCE Lao People’s Democratic Republic Myanmar Cambodia Vietnam
THE EPIDEMIC
THEMES
 
Home » Interview » Dr. Daniel J.M. Tarantola
 
  INTERVIEW - Dr. Daniel J.M. Tarantola,
    Senior Policy Advisor to the Director General, World Health Organisation
 
“Social movement against gaps needed.”
 
How serious is the epidemic in Asia Pacific? There are projections that Asia Pacific is going to be worst hit. Is the comparison with Africa real?
 
One should first recognise the wide diversity in the way HIV epidemics have emerged and spread over the last two decades. This region has some epidemics fuelled by injecting drug practices (e.g. Thailand, Nepal, south-eastern China); others by sexual and parent-to-child transmission (e.g. India); while some epidemics have been fuelled due to unsafe blood transfusion practices, as was witnessed in India and China. The seriousness of the epidemic varies considerably across countries and within each country, across provinces.
 
Overall, Asia Pacific will remain the larger contributor to new cases during this decade, although it is unlikely that the continent will become the site of a massive heterosexually transmitted epidemic as was experienced by Africa. HIV rates in the population at large will remain low (below 1/100). But given the size of the population, the number of cases produced each year will be considerable.
 
The macro-economic impact of HIV/AIDS in Asia Pacific is likely to remain minimal for a number of reasons, including low prevalence rates, the vast pool of people who can participate in economic production, family systems, which can provide some safety nets.
 
How have culture and religion played a role in the campaign against HIV/AIDS in Asia Pacific?
 
Historically, most countries in Asia Pacific went through a period of denial through the late 1980s. Thailand was the first country to rise against HIV/AIDS with a national plan drafted in 1987 (apart from Australia and New Zealand, where the epidemics behaved like those in Western Europe and America). The first reaction to the emergence of HIV/AIDS was to deport HIV-positive visitors or students (e.g. India, China), to incarcerate nationals living with HIV (e.g. several States in India) or to quarantine people on remote islands (as was proposed in Tonga). Being largely associated with sexual practices of men having sex with men, sex work and injecting drug use, HIV/AIDS suffered from major cultural and social stigma.
 
The 1990s witnessed massive information campaigns, which helped reduce the fear and stigma attached to HIV. These campaigns were conducted mostly by NGOs, but governments supported them financially and through other means. Dealing with injecting drug use was and remains an issue most governments are not willing to engage in.
 
Some religious groups (e.g. Bhuddhists in Thailand, Christians in India and the Philippines) helped minimise the individual impact of HIV by opening day care centres or hospices, to which people with AIDS-related diseases were admitted.
 
What populations in your view are more vulnerable in the Asia Pacific region?
 
Mobile populations (migrants for social or economic reasons) and among them, young women in particular are most vulnerable to the HIV/AIDS epidemic.
 
Do the experiences elsewhere in the world provide any opportunities to the region?
 
Asia has constantly learned from outside and has contributed to the advancement of knowledge as well. Applying openness and compassion, rather than repression, in dealing with certain social and behavioral issues is one of the experiences learned by Asia from other continents and adapted to their own situation.
 
What do you think are urgently needed in the region?
 
  • An effective combination of prevention and care strategies, which will help to de-stigmatise HIV/AIDS and encourage people to come forward for testing.
  • A major social movement, which reduces the cultural, social and economic gaps between men and women. This requires greater access to education by women and equal employment opportunities with equal wages.
 
With generic drugs, access to ARV has become a reality. Still majority can’t afford it. What needs to be done?
 
  • Clarify intellectual property laws and their application.
  • Establish treatment centres in every district.
  • Apply government subsidy to cover drug and treatment cost.
  • Put pressure on big pharmaceuticals, as well as generic manufacturers for further price reduction.
 
What are your observations about the PLWHA situation in Asia Pacific - their rights vis-à-vis vaccine trials, access to treatment, medical insurance etc.?
 
It is impossible to answer on a regional basis. The official and public attitude towards PLWHA varies considerably from one country to the next. Vaccine clinical trials in Asia have not involved vaccine candidates used in people already HIV-positive, but among those who are not. Access to treatment remains generally poor and medical insurance is the exception rather than the rule. So, all in all, the situation is not bright.
 
How has AIDS become a human rights issue in the region?
 
The initial debate around human rights revolved around the right to privacy, which emerged because several governments had imposed HIV testing on some population groups and restricted the rights of people found positive. NGOs became active - in Thailand and later in Nepal and India - emphasising protection of human rights in a global context, where human rights were becoming an integral part of HIV prevention strategies. (See AIDS in the World II, by Mann and Tarantola, Oxford University Press 1996.) The World Health Organisation Global Programme on AIDS, UNAIDS and UNDP played a significant role in keeping human rights on the HIV agenda.
 
For historical background, see the special issue of the Journal AIDS, AIDS in Asia in the Pacific, edited by John Kaldor et Al., 1996. For epidemiological data, check the WHO and UNAIDS websites and the site of Monitoring the AIDS Pandemic (MAP) which provides an independent analysis of HIV/AIDS globally and regionally.
 
 
About Dr. Daniel J.M. Tarantola
 
 
 
Previous Interviews
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Features | Guest Column | Interview | Freeze Frame | Artscape | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Home | About Us | Feedback | Sitemap | Contact Us
YOUANDAIDS - THE HIV/AIDS PORTAL FOR ASIA PACIFIC
   
Copyright © UNDP 2007. All Rights Reserved.